“We replaced four tools and a shared Google Sheet with Fill. The Sheet is what I miss the least.”
Fredrik Taube
Söderberg & Partners
“We replaced four tools and a shared Google Sheet with Fill. The Sheet is what I miss the least.”
Before Fill, Söderberg & Partners ran consultants across four point tools — one for vendor management, one for contracts, one for consultants, one for invoice approvals. Each toneeded its on admin time, each integration was someone’s side-of-desk project, and the Sheet was the only place anyone could actually see the whole picture.
It worked. It just cost — in licence fees, in handoff time, and in the trust that comes from having a single answer when finance asks how much you spent on consultants this quarter.
Söderberg moved to Fill in five weeks. The first week imported every active vendor and consultant. The second wired Fill into approvals. By week four, every active engagement — contract, rate card, hours, PO — lived in a single Fill record per consultant.
Procurement, HR and finance got their own views into the same data. Hiring managers got a self-serve marketplace and an AI that drafted the brief from a one-line description. Nobody had to maintain the Sheet.
Söderberg retired the manual work the quarter Fill went live. Through Fills smart competetive bidding, which dramatically helps hiring managers get same quality candidate for better rates, Söderber & Partners saved the total licence fee in just two request. Procurement’s requisition cycle dropped from 9 days to under 2. And the Excel — the one everyone secretly relied on — was archived in week six and not opened again.
“We replaced four tools and a shared E with Fill. The Sheet is what I miss the least,” says Fredrik Taube of Söderberg & Partners.
