Faster implementation, dramatically higher adoption, European-first compliance — in a VMS purpose-built for the consultant economy, not retrofitted from enterprise procurement of the 2000s.
Most Fill customers are live within 4–6 weeks. SAP Fieldglass deployments typically take 6–12 months and require dedicated programme staff.
Fill is built for the hiring manager, not just the procurement admin. 98% adoption keeps every consultant inside the system — and inside policy.
Built for European procurement reality — GDPR, EU AI Act, BankID, CSRD-ready. Not retrofitted from a US-first platform.
The deliverables Fill puts in your hands inside a month — not the quarter Fieldglass promises and rarely delivers.
"Fill and SAP Fieldglass solve different problems. Fieldglass is the established VMS for very large, global contingent programs inside the SAP ecosystem. Fill is the AI procurement system for your consultant workforce — built specifically for consultant and SOW spend, run by agents you supervise, and designed to go live in weeks rather than quarters."
If your existing system is deeply wired into finance and procurement processes that work, and your hiring managers use it without being chased, switching is disruption you do not need. The case for moving is strongest when adoption is the problem — when requests still arrive by email because the system is too heavy for the people expected to use it.
Four things: exporting your active consultant and supplier records, re-establishing approval hierarchies and spend policy, reconnecting integrations to your HR and finance systems, and running both systems in parallel until in-flight engagements close out. The data migration is rarely the hard part; agreeing the policy rules again usually is.
Yes. Supplier agreements and rate cards are your commercial relationships, not the software's. They are exported and re-loaded like any other master data. Treat a switch as a chance to review rate cards against current market benchmarks rather than porting them across unexamined.
Fill connects to the identity, HR, ERP and e-signature systems most enterprises already run — including Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, BankID, Workday, SAP, Personio, Visma, Fortnox, DocuSign and Scrive. The integration question worth asking any vendor is not whether a connector exists, but who owns it and how quickly it is fixed when the upstream API changes.
Adoption is decided by hiring managers, not by procurement. The test is whether someone who raises two consultant requests a year can complete one without training or a manual. Fill customers see 98% hiring-manager adoption, and that number is the one worth interrogating in any vendor conversation — a VMS nobody uses produces no data, and a VMS with no data produces no savings.
The lifecycle is the same; the manual work inside it is not. Fill's agents draft intake requests from a plain-language brief, run supplier RFPs, benchmark proposed rates against your own history, and match invoices to timesheets — proposing each step rather than executing it. Approvals and spend limits stay with your team.
